Robert C. Milla
Robert C. Milla has been an immigration attorney since 2006, dedicating his career to
helping clients fulfill their family and employment goals in the United
States. Mr. Milla’s approach has always been to invest the head
and heart to provide 100% effort.
Mr. Milla’s personal background has given him great appreciation
for the immigrant experience and perspective. His mother immigrated to
the United States from the Philippines as a graduate student, and his
father was born into impoverished circumstances in Brooklyn, New York
to Spanish and Italian immigrant parents, to eventually serve in the United
States Marine Corps and New York City Police Department. With such a foundation,
Mr. Milla was raised to admire the immigrant experience and dream. While
his background is unique to him, Mr. Milla has always found great similarities
to his clients. Mr. Milla has created his own immigrant stories as he
spent extensive time abroad, receiving his Master's degree in Auckland,
New Zealand; working in Niigata, Japan; and completing a legal internship
in Beijing, China. Mr. Milla’s wife, also an attorney, is a first-generation
Indian-American, and together they have two children.
Mr. Milla’s focus on immigration law has included family and employment
cases, as well as removal defense, through which he has earned approvals
for asylum, cancellation of removal, and adjustment of status. His work
on I-601 hardship waiver applications has earned approvals for clients
worldwide, including for countries in Europe, the Americas, Africa, and
Asia. He has successfully represented clients in federal court actions,
including mandamus delay cases and challenges to improperly denied immigration
As an adjunct professor at the Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago-Kent
College of Law, Mr. Milla teaches a legal writing course that he designed
to focus on unique issues of immigration law. He is an active member of
the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), and speaker on immigration
litigation and reform.
Read Robert C. Milla’s 5-star client testimonials at:
- Illinois, 2006
- United States Supreme Court, 2011
- United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 2008
- United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 2006
- Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Juris Doctor, 2006
- University of Auckland (New Zealand), Master of Arts in English with Honors, 2002
- University of Michigan (Ann Arbor), Bachelor of Arts in English, 1998
- Illinois Super Lawyers: Rising Star in Immigration Law, 2016
- Illinois Super Lawyers: Rising Star in Immigration Law, 2015
- Illinois Super Lawyers: Rising Star in Immigration Law, 2014
- CALI Excellence for the Future Award, Legal Writing, 2005
- CALI Excellence for the Future Award, Trial Advocacy, 2005
Chicago-Kent College of Law, Panel on Immigration Executive Orders: "Policy in Transition," February 8, 2017
- AILA Chicago, Fall Litigation Workshop: Waivers in Immigration Court, November 14, 2013
- Marshall Square Resource Network, Immigration Law and Reform News, September 4, 2013
- Latinos Progresando, Immigration Court & Defense: Cancellation of Removal,
August 16, 2013
Afternoon Shift, Immigration Reform and Deportation, June 12, 2013. Listen
- Organizing for Action Mid-Northside Chicago Chapter, Immigration Reform
Panel, April 2013
- AILA Chicago, Litigation Committee Roundtable Discussion, 2013
- AILA Chicago, Litigation Seminar, 2012
- American Bar Association, Essentials of Immigration Court Representation, 2012
- AILA Chicago, Introduction to Federal Litigation, 2011
Notable Court Cases
Matter of N-, Immigration Court 2014. Respondent’s application for asylum from
a central African nation was granted based on imputed political opinion.
H- and D- v. Napolitano, et al., U.S. District Circuit 2013. Within three months of filing the complaint
in federal court, USCIS approved the Plaintiffs’ I-130 Petition
and I-485 Application.
Matter of I-, Immigration Court 2012. Respondent’s application for asylum from
a central African nation was granted based on political opinion.
S- v. Napolitano, et al., U.S. District Court 2010. In a challenge to an improperly denied adjustment
of status (“green card”) application, Plaintiff’s motion
for summary judgment was granted, and he was granted permanent resident status.
Matter of D-, Immigration Court 2009. Respondent’s application for asylum from
a Balkan nation was granted based on political opinion.
Matter of M-, Immigration Court 2008. Respondent’s application for asylum from
an eastern European country was granted based on social group for sexual
K- v. Dorochoff, et al., U.S. District Court 2007. In a mandamus delay action, USCIS’s Motion
to Dismiss was denied, and Petitioner was granted permanent resident status.