USCIS, Service Center, 2018, F-1 student visa reinstatement issued to attend a new school after Applicant's previous school terminated SEVIS record in a 24-hour period after Applicant missed class for a medical emergency

USCIS, Service Center, 2018, H-1B visa approval upon RFE challenging professional occupation analysis for small architecture firm

Matter of A- and Matter of A-, Immigration Court, May 2024. Respondents’ motions to reopen and terminate their removal cases with the Board of Immigration Appeals were granted based on eligibility to adjust status. Our clients, citizens of a western African country, had their prior appeal and motion to reopen filed by a previous attorney denied by the BIA, but we were able to help them to not only reopen their cases but to also terminate them so they could apply for permanent residence with USCIS.

Matter of A-, Immigration Court (Detained), July 2019. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on political opinion.

Matter of A-, Immigration Court, August 2023. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on political opinion

Matter of A-, Immigration Court, February 2024. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on political opinion.

Matter of A-, Immigration Court, January 2024. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on imputed political opinion.

Matter of A-, Immigration Court, May 2024. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on imputed political opinion.

Matter of A-, Immigration Court, October 2019. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on political opinion.

Matter of B-, Immigration Court, February 2022. The immigration judge granted Respondent’s application for permanent resident status based on marriage to her U.S. citizen spouse. A citizen of Moldova, our client won her case and received her green card in court so she and her husband could continue to build their life together in this country.

Matter of B-, Immigration Court, June 2024. The immigration judge granted Respondent’s application for waiver under INA § 237(a)(1)(H), allowing her to keep her permanent resident status despite committing an alleged misrepresentation at the time of adjusting status. A citizen of Jamaica, our client can now continue to live in this country supporting and providing for her U.S. citizen family, along with contributing to her community through her volunteer work, without the fear of deportation.

Matter of B-, Immigration Court, May 2019. Respondent’s application for asylum from a western African nation was granted based on being a member of a particular social group.

Matter of B-, Immigration Court, November 2023. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on political opinion.

Matter of F-, Immigration Court, July 2024. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on imputed political opinion.

Matter of L-, Immigration Court, October 2023. Respondent’s motions to recalendar and terminate his removal case were granted based on eligibility to apply for adjustment of status to permanent resident. Our client, a citizen of Venezuela, was granted permanent resident status by U.S. CItizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in summer 2024.

Matter of M- and Matter of A-, Immigration Court, January 2024. Respondents’ application for asylum from a central Asian nation was granted based on being a member of a particular social group.

Matter of M-, Immigration Court, January 2022. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on being a member of a particular social group.

Matter of M-, Immigration Court, January 2023. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on political opinion.

Matter of N-, Immigration Court, April 2023. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on being a member of a particular social group.

Matter of N-, Immigration Court, August 2023. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on imputed political opinion.

Matter of N-, Immigration Court, July 2024. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on imputed political opinion.

Matter of N-, Immigration Court, November 2022. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on imputed political opinion.

Matter of R-, Immigration Court, July 2023. Respondent’s application for asylum from an eastern European nation was granted based on imputed political opinion.

Matter of S-, Immigration Court, August 2023. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on imputed political opinion

Matter of S-, Immigration Court, July 2019. Respondent’s Form EOIR-42B, Application for Cancellation of Removal and Adjustment of Status for Certain Nonpermanent Residents was granted. With his victory in court, our client, a citizen of Mexico, could stay in the country and continue providing for his U.S. citizen family and the life they are building in the United States.

Matter of S-, Immigration Court, June 2023. The immigration judge granted Respondent’s request for dismissal, which was joined by the government (DHS), despite being removable. With our help, our client, a citizen of Thailand, was able to show that she deserved the chance to remain in the U.S., despite a certain conviction history, based on her family ties to the U.S., exemplary work history, and documented hardship suffered in her past. Our client can now continue living in the U.S. near her loved ones, and work toward her personal and professional goals.

Matter of S-, Immigration Court, March 2023. Respondent’s Form EOIR-42B, Application for Cancellation of Removal and Adjustment of Status for Certain Nonpermanent Residents was granted despite an alleged prior misrepresentation in his immigration history. With his victory in court, our client, a citizen of Poland, could remain in the U.S. and continue building the life he established with his U.S. citizen family.

Matter of S-, Immigration Court, March 2024. Respondent’s Form EOIR-42B, application for VAWA cancellation of removal and adjustment of status was granted following the abuse he suffered as a child. Our client, a citizen of Mexico, was able to win his immigration court case, turn a painful page in his life, and continue working toward his personal and professional goals in the United States.

Matter of T-, Immigration Court, April 2024. The immigration judge granted Respondent’s application for waiver under INA § 237(a)(1)(H), allowing him to retain permanent resident status despite an alleged misrepresentation at the time of adjusting status. A citizen of Bulgaria, our client continues to support and provide for his U.S. citizen family, no longer under the threat of deportation.

Matter of T-, Immigration Court, April August 2023. The immigration judge granted Respondent’s application for waiver under INA § 237(a)(1)(H), allowing her to retain permanent resident status despite an alleged misrepresentation at the time of adjusting status. A citizen of Poland, our client can continue providing for her U.S. citizen family with the emotional and financial support they need, as well as significantly contributing to her community through her profession and volunteer work without worrying about deportation.

Matter of T-, Immigration Court, July 2023. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on political opinion

Matter of T-, Immigration Court, July 2024. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on political opinion.

Matter of V-, Immigration Court, March 2022. The immigration judge approved Respondent’s I-751 Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence filed jointly with his U.S. citizen wife. The government, through the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), put our client, a citizen of Serbia, into immigration court (removal proceedings) alleging that their marriage was a sham. The couple was relieved when our firm helped them to prove their good-faith marriage and win in court, allowing them to move forward in their life together.

Matter of V-L-, Immigration Court, June 2020. The immigration judge granted Respondent’s application for protection under the UN Convention Against Torture, despite a certain conviction history. While our client, a citizen of a Latin American country, was statutorily ineligible for asylum and withholding of removal, we were able to help him receive protection under CAT.

Matter of W-, Immigration Court, January 2024. Respondent’s application for asylum from a central African nation was granted based on political opinion.

Matter of Z-, Immigration Court, June 2022. Respondent’s application for asylum from an eastern Asian nation was granted based on religion.

USCIS, Consulate abroad, 2018, O-1 visa approval and consular visa issuance following consulate improperly denying initial visa interview due to lack of proper nonimmigrant intent